Th
e F
re
que
n
c
y
o
f
D
i
ff
ic
u
lt
I
ntu
ba
ti
on
in
O
b
s
te
tri
c
Pat
ie
n
ts
:
A Rep
ort f
rom
the
M
u
l
ticen
ter P
eri
op
era
t
iv
e
O
u
tc
o
m
es G
rou
p
Res
e
arc
h
Con
s
ort
iu
m
Sh
a
r
o
n
C
h
a
n
g
Re
ale
,
MD
At
te
n
d
ing An
e
sthesiolo
gist
| Bri
g
h
a
m and
W
o
me
n’s Ho
sp
i
t
al
In
stru
cto
r in
An
e
st
he
sia
| Ha
r
va
r
d
M
e
d
ical
Sch
o
o
l
B
a
c
k
groun
d
•
Es
ti
m
a
te
s
fo
r
th
e
i
ncid
e
nc
e
of
di
ff
icu
l
t
a
n
d
f
a
i
l
e
d
in
tu
b
a
ti
o
n
in th
e
ob
s
te
t
ri
c
p
op
ul
a
t
io
n
v
a
ry
wid
el
y
•
Stu
d
ie
s
l
a
rg
e
l
y
fro
m
c
o
u
n
t
rie
s
o
u
tsid
e
t
he
US
or sm
al
le
r
c
ente
rs
or
a
re
d
a
te
d
A
i
ms
●
Es
ti
m
a
te
t
h
e
fre
q
u
e
ncy
o
f d
i
ffi
c
u
l
t
in
tu
b
a
ti
o
n
i
n
o
bste
tri
c
s
●
De
scri
b
e
mana
g
e
men
t
o
f d
if
fi
c
ul
t i
n
tu
ba
ti
on
s
●
De
ter
m
i
ne
ri
sk fa
c
to
rs
fo
r d
i
ff
i
c
ul
t
i
n
tu
b
a
ti
on
●
De
ter
m
i
ne
i
f freq
uenc
y
o
f
d
i
ffi
cu
l
t
i
n
tu
batio
n
is
h
ig
h
e
r i
n
o
bste
tric p
at
ie
nts
Me
thod
s
●
M
ultice
nt
er,
ret
r
os
p
e
c
ti
v
e
,
o
b
s
erv
a
tion
al st
udy
●
Wom
en
a
ge
d
15-4
4
u
n
d
e
rg
o
in
g
g
enera
l
anes
thes
i
a
f
or
c
esar
ea
n
de
live
ry
a
t
4
7
c
e
nte
rs
●
2
00
4-2
01
8
Me
thods
D
i
ff
i
cu
lt Int
ubat
i
on
Fai
l
ed
In
t
u
ba
tion
C
or
m
ac
k
-
Lehane
vie
w ≥
3
A
tt
empt
at
int
u
bation
w
it
hou
t
s
uc
c
e
s
sf
ul
en
do
t
ra
c
he
al
tube
pla
c
emen
t
Int
ub
ati
on
at
tem
pt
s
≥3
FOI
af
ter
f
ail
ed lar
y
ngo
s
c
opy
S
GA
f
ollow
ed
by
suc
c
es
s
f
ul
int
u
bation
Fail
ed int
u
bati
o
n
Me
tho
ds
●
Id
enti
fi
e
d
pre
di
c
to
rs
o
f d
if
fi
c
ul
t i
n
t
ub
a
t
io
n
i
n
c
e
s
a
re
an
d
el
ivery c
o
h
o
rt
●
Co
mpa
red ra
te
of
d
i
ff
i
c
u
lt
in
tu
b
a
ti
o
n
in
o
b
s
te
trics
to
n
o
n
-
o
bste
tric s
ur
g
i
c
a
l
p
a
ti
en
ts
○
Ag
e
and
g
e
n
der
mat
che
d
Result
s
●
1
4,83
0
g
e
n
era
l
anesth
et
ics
fo
r
c
es
are
a
n
de
liv
e
ry
D
i
ff
i
cu
l
t I
ntubat
i
on
Fai
led
In
t
u
ba
tion
N
267
12
%
(
95%
C
I
)
1.8%
(
1.6%
,
2.0%
)
0.08
%
(0
.
05
%
,
0.14
%
)
Fre
qu
enc
y p
er
ge
ne
ral an
es
t
he
t
ic
1:55
1:1,
2
35
D
i
ff
icu
l
t I
ntuba
ti
on
(n=
26
7)
C
or
mac
k
-
Lehane
v
iew
≥
3
24
5 (9
6.
1
%
)
Int
ub
ati
o
n at
tem
p
t
s
≥3
38
(1
6.
7%
)
FOI
f
ollow
e
d
b
y
su
c
c
es
s
f
ul
in
t
ub
at
io
n
4 (1
.
5%
)
S
GA
f
ollow
e
d by
s
uc
c
ess
f
ul i
ntub
at
ion
25
(9
.
4%
)
Resul
t
s
Fai
l
ed
In
t
u
ba
tion
(n=
12
)
R
es
c
u
e
s
up
r
aglo
t
t
i
c
airw
a
y
12
(
100
%
)
R
es
c
u
e
s
ur
gi
c
al
airw
a
y
1 (8
.
3%
)
Mat
e
rn
al dea
t
hs
0
Resul
t
s
Un
iva
ri
a
te Od
d
s
Ra
ti
o
(95
%
CIs
)
Risk
of
Di
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
Int
u
b
a
ti
on
Ov
e
ra
ll
1
:55
BM
I
<25
25
-3
9
.9
>
40
Re
fe
r
e
n
c
e
2
.
6
(
1
.
3, 5.
4)
4
.7 (
2
.
2
,
1
0
.0)
1
:16
1
1
:
6
2
1
:
3
5
Ma
ll
a
m
p
a
ti
Sc
o
re
1
o
r
2
II
I
IV
Re
fe
ren
c
e
2
.0 (
1
.
4
, 2.
8
)
5
.6 (
3
.
0
,
1
0
.3)
1
:70
1
:36
1
:
1
4
Sm
a
ll
hyoi
d
to
men
tum
di
s
t
a
n
c
e
2
.
3
(
0
.
8, 6.
3)
1
:
2
3
L
imi
ted
jaw
pr
o
t
rus
ion
2
.
0
(
0
.
6, 6.
5)
1
:
3
5
L
imi
te
d
mou
th
op
e
n
in
g
7
.9 (
3
.
5
,
1
8
.0
)
1
:11
Alt
e
r
e
d
n
e
c
k
a
n
a
t
o
m
y
1
.5 (
0
.
7
, 3.
2
)
1
:48
Ce
rv
ica
l
s
p
ine
l
imit
a
tion
s
3
.9 (
1
.
4
,
1
0
.9
)
1
:14
Ind
u
ct
ion
o
f
labor
2
.0 (
1
.
1
, 3.
7
)
1
:29
Pre
e
c
lamp
si
a
/Ec
la
mp
s
i
a
1
.
3
(
0
.
8, 1.
9)
1
:
4
5
Result
s
Tot
a
l
, N
Fre
quenc
y
of
di
ff
ic
ult
intu
ba
t
i
on,
n (
%)
Fre
quenc
y
of
f
a
i
le
d
int
uba
t
i
on
,
n
(
%)
Ces
a
rea
n
d
e
li
ve
ri
e
s
1
4
,8
3
0
2
6
7
(1.
8
%
)
1
2
(0
.0
8%
)
Non
-
o
b
st
e
t
ri
c
su
r
g
e
r
y
4
4,
3
4
1
3
56 (
0
.
8%
)
0
OR
2.3
(
95
%
CI,
1.
9 t
o 2.
7
)
for
CD
vs.
no
n
-ob
s
t
et
r
i
c
Limi
t
ati
o
ns
●
Si
gn
if
ican
t var
i
a
b
i
l
i
ty
i
n
d
o
c
um
e
nt
a
ti
on
●
L
imitati
on
s
to
g
ra
n
u
l
arity
of
d
a
ta
●
ICD
c
o
de
s
n
ot
u
n
ifo
rm
l
y
p
rese
nt
Con
c
lu
s
i
ons
●
Ri
s
k
o
f d
i
ff
icul
t intu
b
ation
1
:55
●
Ri
sk o
f fail
ed
i
nt
u
b
at
i
o
n
of 1
:1
,2
3
5
●
Id
e
n
ti
fi
a
bl
e
risk
fa
c
to
rs
fo
r d
if
f
icul
t i
n
tu
ba
ti
on
(BMI,
a
i
rwa
y
c
hara
c
te
ri
st
i
c
s
,
in
du
c
t
i
o
n
o
f l
a
bo
r)
Q
ue
stio
ns
?